No wingbacks?!?!?
- Thread starter riahc3
- Start date
Sminky
Registered User
That is an interesting formation, Schweinsteiger as old school libero?
Great find, Sminky!
He was even better in that role than Sneijder was when I used it with Inter, he was ubiquitous. Whatever team I use now I'll be using that Libero 4-5-1. Playing from the back is a lot easier with this system. I have it setup as Offensive / Down the middle attack / narrow player support / compact and tight closing down. My fulls back are forever rampaging down the flanks sending in crosses. Its better than having wingbacks dare I say it!
I've got my defence set to standard plus Schweinsteiger is always milling around, its fairly solid. I changed the setting to high defensive line and it was a disaster. Although it looks high the settings push the defenders back when I lose possession.
Wingbacks are more prevelant in football than ever now, as someone said Napoli use them, Fiorentina use them alot aswell, most top teams have their full backs operate at wingback really, like dani alaves or bastos for brazil, nonsense to remove them.
Although similar, they are not the same thing.
They help the midfield CONSTRUCT the attack, hence why they are considered a part of the midfield. Sidebacks CONTRIBUTE to a attack.
It seems you have no idea about football do you?
And you read and believe what it says on "their official website"?
Stop please. Just stop.
Sagna and Maicon have NOTHING to do with each other.
(Last post towards you as you obviously have no idea about football at all)
You yourself dont know the english language as you said both contribute to attack, which is not true. Sagna contributes to the attack (well year after year less but in general). Maicon builds the attack. In Inter most balls will go to him, then to the midfield, and with space problably back to him. In Arsenal, Sagna gives it to a midfielder and midfielder to another and another and another and maybe if there is a hole, Sagna will go up and as a option, they will give the ball to him. There is a BIG difference.
As you said, you have no idea the difference between a wingback and a fullback (also called sideback). If you want to learn more about defense (and football in general) look at this, although some points depend on the situation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defender_(association_football)
hehe, what a reaction there ^
In pes who cares about wingbacks, just move your Rmf, Sb to a different position in flaptable and you got yourself a player playing like a wingback.
We've always had a laugh with a friend about this btw.. like manager moves a guy 2cm in flaptable. Would that make the player play in in real life play any different? He'd probably just scratch his head
IRL there's of course a wingbacks as a "playing style & position".
In pes who cares about wingbacks, just move your Rmf, Sb to a different position in flaptable and you got yourself a player playing like a wingback.
We've always had a laugh with a friend about this btw.. like manager moves a guy 2cm in flaptable. Would that make the player play in in real life play any different? He'd probably just scratch his head
IRL there's of course a wingbacks as a "playing style & position".
people that complain about wingbacks are just annoing people that complain about the smallest of issues. Anyway riahc i didn't say sagna and maicon contribyte in attacks similar ways, i said they help out the midfield by recieving passes and getting themselves into space down the flanks. It's the same with wingbacks, they go down the flank, not in the middle of the park. The only difference is when a sb doesn't have the ball, he runs back down in his position which should be covered by a cb. Wheras wingbacks stay there and try to maintain the level in the team trying to build up - which is basically just an offensive fullback as they stay forward for mcuh longer and build up play from the planks
If you read the thread, alot of people have player with wingbacks in the past and they are clearly not SB and much less (even laughable that you even say it) SMF....hehe, what a reaction there ^
In pes who cares about wingbacks, just move your Rmf, Sb to a different position in flaptable and you got yourself a player playing like a wingback.
We've always had a laugh with a friend about this btw.. like manager moves a guy 2cm in flaptable. Would that make the player play in in real life play any different? He'd probably just scratch his head
IRL there's of course a wingbacks as a "playing style & position".
Another guy without a clue about football. I mean you can enjoy a video game, thats great. But its just foolish when you try to talk about real football.
you are clueless - wih your explanations i read above you act like wing-backs are the most important position and without it you can not score goals or your midfield will play crap as they rely on wingbacks to do everything. If disagree with what i just said, you agree that an offensive fullback will do the same job. I mean, you tell me, what does a wingback do that a offensive sideback doesn't - go in the box, scire long shots.
NO - they need to be of exceptional stamina, be able to provide crosses upfield and defend effectively against opponents' attacks down the flanks. A defensive midfielder is usually fielded to cover the advances of wingbacks so in the end of the day they are just more offensive like an offensive side back
NO - they need to be of exceptional stamina, be able to provide crosses upfield and defend effectively against opponents' attacks down the flanks. A defensive midfielder is usually fielded to cover the advances of wingbacks so in the end of the day they are just more offensive like an offensive side back